Skip to Main Content

Systematic Reviews for the Social Sciences

world map scaled by number of documents with authors from each country in Web of Science. Map shows "global North" as larger than other regions

Location of Studies

You may have chosen to use a specific country or region as one of your inclusion/exclusion criteria or you might want global research in your systematic review. You will need to think about how you will ensure that the results of your search represents the region you want to cover. 

The above map, produced in 2016, illustrates how the research indexed in Web of Science is weighted towards the Global North. It is likely that you will encounter a similar spread of research in other major databases too. If the region you have chosen is in the Global South or you want to show a global research picture try exploring some of the databases below in your scoping searches. You could also contact your subject librarian for further guidance. 

Location Specific Resources

Grey Literature

Including grey literature in your search can help you better represent a global research picture - sometimes research from the global south is treated as grey literature and isn't always published in prestigious journals or indexed in big commercial databases. There are lots of places you can look for grey literature. The databases below can be useful, but you should also look at the information on the next page of the guide for more information on finding grey literature.

Next step: Grey Literature

Libraries are not Neutral

small pile of B&W zines with title "Libraries are not neutral: a pocket-sized guide to libraries and their colonial legacy"

If you would like to understand more about why voices from the Global South aren't always included in major databases, then this short zine on the colonial history and legacy in libraries can provide some more information.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion and exclusion criteria are decided in advance and included in the protocol. They are the criteria that decide which studies should be included in the systematic review analysis. 

"The review protocol should provide explicit, unambiguous, inclusion criteria for the review."

The JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, 2020 

 

Possible inclusion/exclusion criteria to consider

Date: Has there already been a systematic review in this area? Refer to this study and it's findings in your introduction and start your review AFTER that study.

Geographic location of study: you may only be interested in studies from a particular country, or countries that share demographic or economic factors.

Language: very few systematic reviews request translations of papers!

Participants:  age group, gender, ethnicity etc…

Participant Experience: participants may need to meet a condition to be included (eg: received a particular diagnosis, prescribed a drug, taken a class)

Peer Review: Some systematic reviews will exclude non-peer reviewed literature, but many will include grey literature.

Setting: Where are the participants located? (School, hospital, prison)

Study Design: Randomised control trials, participation studies, longitudinal studies…

Type of Publication: usually looking for original studies, rather than editorials, reviews or letters

 

The Cochrane Handbook recommends:

"The population, intervention and comparison components of the question, with the additional specification of types of study that will be included, form the basis of the pre-specified eligibility criteria for the review."

Chapter 3 of the Cochrane Handbook has lots of advice on selecting your inclusion or eligibility criteria.